What it means for leaders

Prompt injection has moved from research papers to catalogued vulnerabilities in shipping products. Treat any AI feature that reads untrusted content (email, web pages, documents) as an attack surface, with least-privilege tools and output checks.

What would change the reading: Quarter-over-quarter growth, and vulnerabilities in agent frameworks and connectors.

The trend

2023 Q12026 Q3

Every reading

DateValueChangeSource
49+58.1%Source
31+10.7%Source
28+40.0%Source
20+53.8%Source
13±0.0%Source
13+160.0%Source
5−44.4%Source
9+50.0%Source
6+50.0%Source
4Source
0−100.0%Source
1Source
0−100.0%Source
1±0.0%Source
1—Source

Definition and method

What it measures
CVE records published in the quarter whose description mentions prompt injection.
Population
CVE records in the NIST National Vulnerability Database
Updated
Quarterly
Source
NIST National Vulnerability Database · Public domain (US government work)

Caveats

  • Keyword matching misses records that describe the flaw in other words.
  • Disclosure practices for AI flaws are still forming, so counts understate the problem.

Cite this

Enterprise AI in Numbers, "New prompt injection vulnerabilities published each quarter", https://lucianoayres.com/ai-brief/data/llm-vulnerabilities/, retrieved October 25, 2026. Data: NIST National Vulnerability Database.

Download every indicator (CSV) · Methodology