What it means for leaders

Expert-level accuracy is rising fast but remains well short of reliable. Use these models to draft and check expert analysis, with the expert still accountable for the answer.

What would change the reading: The pace of gains, and whether calibration (knowing when it is wrong) improves with accuracy.

The trend

September 24, 2024September 3, 2026

Every reading

DateValueChangeDetailSource
54.8%+8.3 pointsGPT-6 AstraSource
46.5%+0.1 pointsClaude Fable 5.1Source
46.4%+8.9 pointsGemini 3.1 ProSource
37.5%+5.9 pointsGemini 3 ProSource
31.6%+6.3 pointsGPT-5 ProSource
25.3%+3.7 pointsGPT-5Source
21.6%+1.3 pointsGemini 2.5 Pro (Jun 2025)Source
20.3%+2.1 pointso3Source
18.2%+10.1 pointsGemini 2.5 Pro (Mar 2025)Source
8.1%+0.1 pointso1-proSource
8.0%+3.4 pointso1Source
4.6%—Gemini 1.5 Pro (Sept 2024)Source

Definition and method

What it measures
The highest accuracy any evaluated model reaches on Humanity's Last Exam, questions written by subject experts to sit beyond what earlier models could answer, with its lab.
Population
AI models evaluated on Humanity's Last Exam, as compiled by Epoch AI
Updated
When new models are evaluated
Source
Epoch AI, Benchmarking hub · CC BY 4.0

Caveats

  • Scores come from independent evaluators compiled by Epoch AI, not from the labs, and depend on the settings and tools each run used.
  • The leader is the best result so far, dated by the release of the model that set it; a model evaluated late can take the lead after its release date.
  • Results are compiled from several evaluators, so settings vary between models.

Cite this

Enterprise AI in Numbers, "Top score on Humanity's Last Exam, the benchmark of expert-level questions", https://lucianoayres.com/ai-brief/data/expert-reasoning-benchmark-leader/, retrieved October 25, 2026. Data: Epoch AI, Benchmarking hub.

Download every indicator (CSV) · Methodology