What it means for leaders

Preference rankings show which model employees are likely to favour in everyday chat. Treat a change in the lead as a signal to check user satisfaction, not as proof of better accuracy.

What would change the reading: A lead from a new lab, or a large rating gap between the top two.

The trend

January 25, 2024October 22, 2026

Every reading

DateValueChangeDetailSource
1,525.7 points−7.4 pointsGemini 4 Argon (High)Source
1,533.1 points+28.4 pointsgemini-4-argon-highSource
1,504.7 points−6.9 pointsclaude-opus-5-maxSource
1,511.6 points+11.3 pointsclaude-opus-5-maxSource
1,500.3 points+1.0 pointsclaude-opus-4-6-thinkingSource
1,499.3 points−1.3 pointsclaude-opus-4-6-thinkingSource
1,500.6 points±0.0 pointsclaude-opus-4-6-thinkingSource
1,500.6 points−1.0 pointsclaude-opus-4-6-thinkingSource
1,501.6 points+20.4 pointsclaude-opus-4-6Source
1,481.2 points−3.2 pointsgemini-3-proSource
1,484.4 points−3.2 pointsgemini-3-proSource
1,487.6 points+22.9 pointsgemini-3-proSource
1,464.7 points−2.0 pointsgemini-2.5-proSource
1,466.7 points+0.2 pointsgemini-2.5-proSource
1,466.5 points−7.9 pointsgemini-2.5-proSource
1,474.4 points−3.1 pointsgemini-2.5-proSource
1,477.5 points+68.2 pointsgemini-2.5-proSource
1,409.3 points−8.8 pointso3-2025-04-16Source
1,418.1 points+12.2 pointso3-2025-04-16Source
1,405.9 points+43.2 pointschatgpt-4o-latest-20250326Source
1,362.7 points+5.0 pointsdeepseek-r1Source
1,357.7 points−1.0 pointsdeepseek-r1Source
1,358.7 points+25.1 pointso1-2024-12-17Source
1,333.6 points−1.5 pointso1-previewSource
1,335.1 points−4.0 pointso1-previewSource
1,339.1 points+22.9 pointso1-previewSource
1,316.2 points+30.1 pointschatgpt-4o-latestSource
1,286.1 points−0.9 pointsgpt-4o-2024-05-13Source
1,287.0 points+5.4 pointsgpt-4o-2024-05-13Source
1,281.6 points+24.2 pointsgpt-4o-2024-05-13Source
1,257.4 points+3.8 pointsgpt-4-turbo-2024-04-09Source
1,253.6 points±0.0 pointsclaude-3-opus-20240229Source
1,253.6 points+64.2 pointsgpt-4-1106-previewSource
1,189.4 points—gpt-4-0314Source

Definition and method

What it measures
The rating of the #1 model on the LMArena text leaderboard, built from people's votes between two anonymous answers to the same prompt, at the last board of each month.
Population
Models ranked on the LMArena text leaderboard (overall category)
Updated
Monthly (from weekly boards)
Source
LMArena, leaderboard dataset · CC BY 4.0

Caveats

  • Votes reward answers people like, which isn't the same as answers that are correct.
  • Ratings are relative to the models on the board at the time, so values from different years aren't directly comparable.

Cite this

Enterprise AI in Numbers, "The AI model people prefer most in blind comparisons (LMArena text leaderboard)", https://lucianoayres.com/ai-brief/data/human-preference-leader/, retrieved October 25, 2026. Data: LMArena, leaderboard dataset.

Download every indicator (CSV) · Methodology